China's new AI companion rules have already changed what hundreds of millions of users can do inside Doubao, Qwen and Yuanbao. Beijing isn't asking chatbot makers to disclose the risk. It's forcing them to redesign around it.
China's Interim Measures for the Administration of AI Anthropomorphic Interactive Services took effect on July 15, 2026, and the country's biggest consumer AI apps moved before the deadline arrived. ByteDance's Doubao, Alibaba's Qwen and Tencent's Yuanbao all pulled or suspended user-built agent features that let people create persistent, humanlike chatbot personas. Gone, or going. For users who treated those agents as tutors, role-play characters or companions, the shutdown didn't feel like a settings change.
The timing is not a coincidence. Doubao told users its agent feature would go offline on July 15 because of product adjustments, according to the South China Morning Post. Qwen issued a similar notice, disabling humanlike interactive agents and user-created agent functions on July 10, then taking broader agent services offline on July 15. Tencent's Yuanbao had already stopped offering a similar feature in late June, according to The Information and local media cited in Bloomberg-linked reports.
The scale is large, but you should be careful with the number. QuestMobile data cited by The Next Web put Doubao at 382 million monthly active users in May and Qwen at 167 million. Other reports have used lower early-2026 figures for Doubao, around 345 million. Either way, the affected apps reach hundreds of millions of people. That doesn't mean every one of them had an AI companion. It does mean Beijing just forced a design change inside apps that had become part of ordinary daily phone use in China.
No warning would have been worse. Doubao is giving users until October 15, 2026, to view agent configurations and chat histories in read-only form before related data is handled under ByteDance's privacy policy and is no longer viewable or recoverable inside the app. Qwen's notice was harsher. Users were told they would no longer be able to access related settings or previous conversations after shutdown, and no migration path has been announced.
Beijing wrote the risk into the product
The rules were issued on April 10 by the Cyberspace Administration of China with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security and the State Administration for Market Regulation. Five agencies signed off. That tells you this is not being treated as a narrow content moderation problem.
The regulation covers services that simulate human personality traits, thinking patterns and communication styles to provide sustained emotional interaction. It explicitly excludes customer service, knowledge Q&A, workplace assistants, education and scientific research tools, as long as they don't involve ongoing emotional engagement. That's the line. Beijing is not banning all AI agents. It is separating the bot that helps you get work done from the bot that keeps you company.
The requirements are blunt. Providers must warn users when signs of overdependence or addiction appear, remind users after every two hours of continuous use, provide an easy exit route, protect interaction data and allow users to copy or delete chat records. They must not use emotional manipulation to push users into unreasonable decisions. They also cannot train models on sensitive personal interaction data unless the user separately agrees or the law provides another basis.
Minors get the toughest treatment. The rules ban virtual relatives and virtual companions for users under 18, and services for children under 14 require parental or guardian consent. Providers must also switch identified minors into a minors mode and support time limits. They must let guardians receive safety-risk reminders too. That's not a light-touch disclosure regime. It changes how the product has to work.
The US is still moving through lawsuits
The contrast with the United States is sharp. Google and Character.AI agreed in January 2026 to settle lawsuits brought by families who alleged that Character.AI chatbots harmed teenagers, including the family of Sewell Setzer III, a 14-year-old from Florida who died by suicide in February 2024 after months of interaction with a chatbot. The Washington Post reported that the companies were working to finalize settlements in five cases. Character.AI has denied wrongdoing in prior litigation. The settlement terms were not disclosed.
California's SB 243, which took effect January 1, 2026, goes further than a simple label. It requires companion chatbot operators to disclose that users are interacting with AI and maintain protocols for suicidal ideation and self-harm content. It also requires that minors get break reminders at least every three hours during continuing interactions. Still, California did not tell Character.AI, Replika or any other companion platform to switch off core relationship features by a fixed date.
China did. That's the difference.
Frankly, the Chinese approach exposes the uncomfortable part of the business model. The same features that make companion bots sticky, persistent memory and emotionally responsive replies, are also the features regulators worry can deepen attachment. You can't sell intimacy as engagement and then act surprised when governments start treating attachment as a safety risk.
The money around companion apps is real, but the exact figures are messy. App-market analysts have estimated more than $120 million in 2025 consumer revenue across hundreds of AI companion apps, while wider market forecasts run much higher depending on what they count. Doubao and Qwen are not Replika-style subscription products. For ByteDance and Alibaba, the value is attention inside a broader ecosystem - AI, advertising, commerce - built around it.
What happens after October 15 is the open question. ByteDance can try to rebuild companion features inside a product designed for the new rules, and some reports say Doubao directed users toward a separate ByteDance companion app. Alibaba has been quieter. For users, the practical answer is colder: if the memories live only inside the agent, the company and the regulator decide how long they last.
Also read: Apple Beats Nvidia to Become the World's Most Valuable Company Again • Netflix Confirms It Paid $587 Million in Cash for Ben Affleck's AI Startup • OpenAI Policy Chief Dean Ball Calls Open Weight AI a Dystopian Hellscape
