Italy wants more AI infrastructure, but Lombardy is making clear that the cheapest land cannot automatically become the next server farm.
Lombardy has approved Italy's first regional law aimed directly at new data centers, and the signal to developers is blunt: use old industrial land, not open countryside. The measure raises construction charges by 100% for projects on agricultural land and by 200% for sites in protected green areas, a cost penalty designed to push AI infrastructure away from farmland and toward brownfield redevelopment.
That distinction matters. The original debate around the law has often been reduced to a simple 200% tax on farmland, but Italian reporting this week from DDay and Il Giorno points to a more specific structure: higher charges for agricultural areas, even steeper charges for specially protected areas, and no extra burden for disused industrial sites. It is still a strong intervention. It is just not quite the same as saying every farm-based project faces a 200% hit.
The timing is awkward for Italy's data center ambitions. Reuters reported in January 2025 that investments in Italian data centers were expected to double to 10 billion euros across 2025 and 2026, driven by cloud expansion and demand tied to artificial intelligence. Lombardy is central to that story. The region around Milan already hosts the country's densest data center cluster, which makes it both attractive to operators and exposed to the political pressure that comes when power, water, land, and planning decisions all collide in one place.
The logic behind the regional law is easy to see. Data center developers have increasingly looked beyond the usual urban hubs and toward cheaper land, including agricultural and greenfield sites, where large plots can make projects easier to assemble. That search for land has been one of the quieter forces behind Europe's AI buildout. It is also becoming one of its most visible sources of resistance.
For local governments, the appeal of a data center is not always obvious when the project arrives on productive or near-productive land. These sites can occupy large areas while creating relatively few permanent jobs after construction. They can also bring difficult questions about electricity demand, water use, heat management, grid connections, and the long-term loss of open land. In regions where agriculture still carries economic and cultural weight, those questions quickly become political.
That is why the Lombardy move matters beyond one region. It shows that the usual industrial policy argument for data centers, jobs, tax revenue, digital competitiveness, and AI readiness, is now meeting a stronger land-use argument from environmental groups, farming interests, and local councils. The result is not just more scrutiny. It is cost inflation. Once the political system starts pricing in land resistance, the financial model for rural campuses becomes harder to defend.
Italy is not moving in a vacuum either. Reuters reported in 2024 that the country had been selected for a potential 30 billion euro data center investment by a single foreign company, according to Industry Minister Adolfo Urso, though the company was not named. International operators have also continued to expand in the Italian market. The country clearly wants the capital. The question is where that capital can go without creating a fight over soil, water, and local control.
The push toward brownfield sites
The practical response may be a faster shift toward urban, industrial, and brownfield sites, especially in countries where local opposition to greenfield development is rising. That fits the direction Lombardy is now trying to force. The law gives priority to disused industrial areas and requires municipalities to map available brownfield locations, which should make it harder for developers to argue that farmland is the default option.
At the national level, Rome has been moving in the other direction, at least procedurally. In February 2026, Italy introduced a single authorization framework for data centers under Law Decree No. 21/2026, a reform meant to speed approvals and improve legal certainty for developers. That does not erase regional politics. It creates a more complicated map, where national leaders want strategic infrastructure built faster while regional authorities try to steer where that infrastructure lands.
For investors, the message is that Europe's data center market is becoming more selective. Sites close to existing power, industrial zoning, and faster permitting routes will gain value. Agricultural land may still look cheaper on a spreadsheet, but the real cost now includes local opposition, planning delays, higher charges, and reputational risk. That changes the calculation before a developer even starts negotiating for grid capacity.
There is also a broader European implication. If Lombardy can use construction charges to discourage development on sensitive land, other regions may follow with their own restrictions, fees, or planning hurdles. That would not stop AI infrastructure growth, but it would redirect it. Developers would be pushed toward places that can absorb large electrical loads without triggering a land-use backlash, which usually means industrial zones, urban fringes, and converted brownfield assets rather than open countryside.
For SF readers, that is the real takeaway. Europe's AI infrastructure trade is no longer just about power availability and fiber access. It is becoming a land politics story. Once regulators start using costs to steer projects away from farmland and protected areas, the cheapest site on the map may no longer be the cheapest site in the model.
Also read: Marvell's AI forecast lift shows the chip boom is still spreading • Newcleo's Nasdaq plan shows nuclear is chasing AI money now • Google engineer arrested over Polymarket bets on search data
