Samsung avoided a major chip strike, but the peace is already fraying inside the company. A bonus plan built around AI memory profits has opened a new fight between the workers who make the money and the divisions needed to deliver it.
Samsung’s latest labor problem is not just about pay anymore. It is about whether the company can keep its AI memory machine running smoothly at the exact moment customers are demanding more high-bandwidth memory than the industry can comfortably supply.
The company reached a tentative wage deal this week that could hand memory division employees bonuses of roughly 600 million won, about $400,000, depending on profit performance. That was enough to avert an 18-day strike that had been scheduled to begin on May 21. But the agreement has now set off anger in other parts of Samsung, where some workers in the Device eXperience division, covering smartphones, TVs and home appliances, may receive closer to 6 million won, or about $4,000.
That gap matters because Samsung is not a simple memory company. It is a sprawling industrial system where design, foundry, testing, packaging, mobile devices and appliances all sit under the same corporate roof. When one group receives a life-changing payout and another receives a fraction of that, the issue stops being accounting. It becomes morale, execution and trust.
According to Tom’s Hardware, citing Seoul Economic Daily, the dispute has already spread into Samsung’s foundry and TSP units, the test and package operations that handle critical back-end work for high-bandwidth memory. Meetings have reportedly been canceled, production and verification lines are facing work negligence, and one source said major project decisions had come to a complete halt.
The reason this fight has become so combustible is simple: AI has turned memory into the most important part of Samsung’s profit story. Samsung reported first-quarter 2026 revenue of 133.9 trillion won and operating profit of 57.2 trillion won, both all-time quarterly highs. Its Device Solutions division, which houses semiconductors, generated 53.7 trillion won in operating profit, almost all of the company’s profit for the quarter.
The memory business was the engine. Samsung said demand for high-value AI products and higher average selling prices drove record quarterly performance, while the company began mass product sales of HBM4 and SOCAMM2 for Nvidia’s Vera Rubin platform. That is not a side note. HBM is one of the most constrained components in the AI infrastructure buildout, and suppliers that can deliver qualified volume have real leverage with hyperscalers and accelerator makers.
Workers understand that leverage. Samsung employees have watched SK Hynix become the clearest winner in HBM, helped by its tight relationship with Nvidia and its earlier lead in advanced memory packaging. Reports around the Samsung negotiations repeatedly point to SK Hynix’s own profit-sharing structure as the benchmark. Once that comparison entered the factory floor, Samsung’s old bonus formulas were going to be hard to defend.
The tentative Samsung deal allocates 10.5% of the semiconductor division’s operating profit as stock-based bonuses, plus an additional 1.5% in cash. It also includes a 6.2% average wage increase. For memory workers, that may produce the headline-grabbing payout. For non-memory teams and DX employees, it looks like a reminder that they are attached to the same company but not the same upside.
The weak point is packaging
The most immediate risk is not that smartphones ship late or appliance teams complain loudly. It is that Samsung’s AI chip supply chain depends on internal units that now feel cut out of the reward. Testing and packaging are especially sensitive because HBM is not useful to customers until stacks are assembled, verified and delivered at quality. A slowdown in those operations can turn strong wafer output into missed delivery windows.
That is a serious problem for Samsung because it is trying to prove it can close the gap with SK Hynix while competing with Micron for AI memory orders. Customers buying HBM for advanced AI systems do not only care about technical claims. They care about qualification timelines, delivery confidence and whether a supplier can scale without internal friction. In this market, reliability is part of the product.
The vote on the wage agreement runs through May 27 and requires participation from more than half of eligible members, followed by majority approval. That gives Samsung a few days to turn a fragile deal into something that employees can live with. It also gives unhappy workers time to organize against it. A smaller union representing DX employees has pushed back, and shareholder groups have threatened legal action over whether the profit-linked payout needs shareholder approval under Korean law.
Samsung’s semiconductor CEO Jun Young-hyun has reportedly urged employees to move past the conflict, but the company’s deeper challenge is structural. AI profits are now so large that old internal pay boundaries no longer feel stable. If memory captures the value while the surrounding system absorbs the pressure, resentment will not stay contained.
The market should watch the May 27 vote, but the bigger signal will come after it. If Samsung can keep TSP, foundry and memory teams aligned, the bonus fight may become an expensive but manageable labor reset. If internal resistance continues to slow decisions and packaging work, the cost will not just show up in payroll. It will show up in HBM4 delivery, customer confidence and Samsung’s ability to turn the AI boom into durable advantage.
Also read: Rising U.S. debt is starting to test the AI funding boom • OpenAI is paying up to $445,000 for AI safety judgment • OpenAI makes Codex harder to ignore on locked Macs
