Charles Schwab is no longer watching prediction markets from the sidelines. Its planned S&P 500 contracts with Cboe show how quickly a product once treated as gambling-adjacent has moved into the brokerage mainstream.
Schwab's move is striking because Rick Wurster has spent months drawing a bright line between investing and gambling. Now the firm he runs is preparing to offer customers a yes-or-no contract on where the S&P 500 closes. If you're a Schwab customer, that means prediction-style trading may soon sit beside the ordinary tools of a brokerage account, not in a separate corner of the internet.
The Wall Street Journal reported on June 19 that Schwab is working with Cboe Global Markets on all-or-nothing options tied to the S&P 500. The trade is simple enough to understand: you take a position on whether the index closes above or below a set level. Get it right, and the contract pays a fixed cash amount. Get it wrong, and it pays nothing. Schwab expects to make the product available in the coming months, according to the Journal.
That simplicity is exactly why this matters. Options can be intimidating. Event contracts don't feel that way. They turn a market view into a plain question, and that is powerful for retail traders who already live inside brokerage apps. Cboe is also developing a feature called "the plus zone," which would allow a partial payout when the trader lands close to the final result without hitting the exact target. It softens the hard edge of a pure binary bet, but it doesn't change the basic fact: Schwab is moving into the format.
Schwab is trying to keep its line clean. The firm is sticking to financial benchmarks and staying away from politics, sports and entertainment contracts. Frankly, that distinction is doing a lot of work. It lets Schwab say this is a market tool, not a betting product, even though the customer experience still comes down to a wager on a future outcome.
Wurster's earlier position was not subtle. Barron's reported in November that he told more than 5,000 financial advisers he worried prediction markets were blending investing and gambling, especially for younger investors. The Journal later quoted him saying there is a "really bright line" between the two. He wasn't wrong to worry. A contract on the S&P 500 is not the same as a bet on Monday Night Football, but the interface can make both feel dangerously similar.
The competitive pressure changed the calculation. Robinhood has pushed hard into prediction markets through partners including Kalshi and ForecastEx, and the Journal reported that more than one million Robinhood users traded over nine billion event contracts in the past year. Robinhood has also moved to build more of its own market infrastructure through a joint venture with Susquehanna tied to MIAXdx, with operations expected in 2026. When a rival turns a once-niche product into one of its fastest-growing lines, sitting out stops looking principled and starts looking expensive.
Schwab wants the format without the circus
There is a defensible version of Schwab's argument. A contract tied to the S&P 500, the Fed, inflation or another financial benchmark can help a trader express a view in a defined-risk way. You know the payout. You know the loss. You don't need to manage a complex options spread to make the point. For some customers, that clarity is useful.
But don't pretend the product becomes sober just because the underlying asset is respectable. A yes-or-no S&P 500 contract still invites fast decisions, short time horizons and the belief that a market forecast can be reduced to a quick click. Schwab's job will be to educate customers before the product is live, not after losses produce complaints. The firm has built its reputation on trust, advice and scale. Barron's reported Schwab had $13.14 trillion in total client assets at the end of May, which gives this launch a weight Robinhood's early prediction push did not have.
Kalshi is closest to the collision point. It is CFTC-regulated, it already lists financial event contracts, and it sits inside Robinhood's prediction-market experience. The more Schwab and Cboe normalize index-linked contracts, the more Kalshi has to decide where it wants to compete: financial benchmarks, sports, politics, macro events, you name it. Polymarket sits in a different lane. It made its name with crypto-native users and fast-moving political and real-world event markets, not S&P 500 closing levels.
The bigger effect is legitimacy. A Schwab product routed through Cboe tells ordinary brokerage customers that event contracts are no longer just for crypto traders, sports bettors or the Kalshi crowd. That doesn't make them safe. It makes them mainstream.
And here's the thing: once mainstream brokers add a product, they rarely keep it frozen in its first form. Schwab says financial outcomes are the boundary. Competitors will keep testing broader catalogs. Regulators and state gambling authorities are already fighting over where the line sits, including a recent Kentucky lawsuit involving Kalshi, Crypto.com and Polymarket over a new prediction-market tax. This story is not settled.
Schwab has not suddenly become a prediction-market true believer. It has accepted that the format is now part of retail trading. That is the real turn. The firm that warned about the line between investing and gambling is now trying to draw that line from inside the business.
Also read: Midas wants to become Turkey's financial super-app after raising the country's biggest-ever fintech round • OpenAI is racing to go public while its CEO openly admits he doesn't want to • The Senate has roughly 31 days to give crypto its clearest rules ever or leave the industry guessing until 2027
