The FCC's expansion of its Chinese equipment ban to cover older product models, combined with the Pentagon's decision to blacklist Alibaba, Baidu, and BYD, marks a sharp acceleration in the US effort to strip Chinese technology from its critical infrastructure and defense supply chain.
The rules keep coming, and they keep getting broader. On June 27, the FCC expanded its existing ban on Chinese telecom and surveillance equipment to cover previously authorized older models from Huawei, ZTE, Hytera, Hikvision, and Dahua. Not just new designs, not just fresh shipments: gear that already held FCC approval and was sitting in warehouses, government facilities, and public safety networks. The expansion takes effect in early July. That is a meaningful escalation, because the original 2022 ban left a large loophole: legacy hardware, cleared years ago, could still be sold, marketed, and used. Washington is now closing it.
The rationale is straightforward, if long overdue. As the FCC noted in its April 2026 proposal that preceded this action, older authorized equipment is often functionally equivalent to newer banned products and continues receiving firmware updates from its manufacturers. A surveillance camera made by Hangzhou Hikvision three years ago does not become safe simply because a newer model is prohibited. The FCC also voted in April to advance a proposal that would bar Chinese laboratories from certifying electronics sold in the US, a move that would affect roughly 75 percent of US-bound devices currently tested in China. That rulemaking is still working through a public comment period, but the direction is unmistakable.
Then there is the Pentagon's updated 1260H list, published earlier this month, which added 65 new entities including Alibaba, Baidu, BYD, Unitree, and Nio. The Defense Department now names 188 Chinese companies it considers affiliated with China's military or defense industrial base. The practical effect: the DoD is prohibited from contracting directly with listed companies starting June 30, and from procuring their products or services through third parties beginning in June 2027. Alibaba immediately said it would take "all available legal action" against what it called a misrepresentation. Baidu said it would "not hesitate to use all options available." Neither protest changes the timeline.
China hit back on June 22. Beijing placed 10 American industrial suppliers on its export control list, including rare earth miners MP Materials and USA Rare Earth, barring exports of dual-use items to those firms. It also excluded 46 US companies, mostly defense contractors, from government procurement. The Ministry of Commerce framed it as retaliation for the Pentagon list expansion. Analysts at The Asia Group noted that most targeted US companies have little or no meaningful business exposure in China, making the move largely symbolic for now. Largely, not entirely: rare earth curbs on MP Materials and USA Rare Earth carry real weight in an environment where battery and magnet supply chains are already under pressure.
Here's the part that doesn't get enough attention. The US is simultaneously trying to build the world's most ambitious AI infrastructure while severing ties with the country that manufactures a large share of the components required to do it. According to reporting from Tom's Hardware, close to half of planned US data center builds in 2026 are projected to be delayed or canceled, with shortages of transformers, switchgear, and batteries among the primary constraints. Many of those constrained components have Chinese suppliers in the chain. Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, and Microsoft are expected to spend more than $650 billion this year expanding AI capacity. The supply chain math is getting harder, not easier.
The FCC's ban on Chinese consumer routers in March 2026 and the prohibition on Chinese drone imports in December 2025 already pushed enterprise procurement teams to find alternatives. The expansion of the equipment ban to older models now forces a more comprehensive audit. Every facility relying on Hikvision cameras or Hytera communications gear in public safety or critical infrastructure contexts has a compliance problem. The replacement market for that equipment is real money, and it flows to Axis Communications, Motorola Solutions, and a handful of other Western vendors who are not remotely scaled to absorb the volume immediately.
China, for its part, is moving in the opposite direction at speed. Beijing is drafting a plan to spend roughly 2 trillion yuan over five years on a national AI data center grid, with at least 80 percent of the underlying technology sourced domestically. In May 2026, the government formally approved nine categories of domestically developed AI chips for government deployment, with Huawei, Moore Threads, Biren Technology, and Alibaba Cloud receiving clearance. Whether that domestic chip supply can actually meet demand by the 2028 target is a separate question, but the intent to decouple from US technology is as deliberate as Washington's intent to decouple from China's.
The two decouplings are now running in parallel and feeding each other. Every new US restriction gives Beijing a stronger political case for accelerating domestic alternatives. Every Chinese retaliation gives Washington a stronger political case for tighter bans. The technology supply chain that powered two decades of globalization is being dismantled in real time, and neither side is blinking. American enterprises building AI infrastructure need to be planning around that reality now, not in 2027 when the third-party procurement restrictions on Pentagon-listed firms kick in.
Also read: Amazon raises GPU reservation prices 20 percent as the era of cheap cloud AI comes to an end • Washington just told the AI industry it has veto power over what the world can use • Regulators are finally building the AI they need to police the markets they oversee