Jul 26, 2026 · 7:03 AM
Subscribe
Home Crypto

Bitcoin is clinging to $64,000 as $312 million in liquidations and ETF outflows signal a market under real pressure

Bitcoin is holding near $64,000 after a July 25 slide triggered $87 million in BTC liquidations and $312 million in total crypto wipeouts. Spot ETFs bled $465 million over two days as the 10-year Treasury yield hit 4.71% and oil climbed above $100, testing institutional conviction in the world's largest cryptocurrency.

Judith Murphy
· 5 min read · 567 reads
Bitcoin is clinging to $64,000 as $312 million in liquidations and ETF outflows signal a market under real pressure

Bitcoin is still hovering around $64,000, but the real problem is not one bad price print. ETF money is flickering, Treasury yields are biting, and Washington has turned crypto regulation into another risk factor.

The line traders are watching is brutally simple: Bitcoin has to stay near $64,000 long enough for buyers to prove they still exist. It slipped below that level after nearly touching $67,000 earlier in the week, and Bitcoin.com reported that the move triggered $87 million in Bitcoin liquidations and $312 million across the wider crypto market. That is the story. Leveraged longs leaned too far forward, then the floor moved.

You do not need to dress this up as a deep mystery. Bitcoin is trading like a high-beta asset at a time when the rest of the market is suddenly less forgiving. The Wall Street Journal reported that the 10-year Treasury yield reached an intraday high of 4.711% on July 23, its highest level since January 2025, while the Financial Times reported that Brent crude briefly climbed above $100 before falling back below that mark. Risk-free yield is up. Energy stress is back. That is not noise.

ETF demand is wobbling

The spot Bitcoin ETF tape gives you the cleanest read on institutional nerves. Decrypt reported, citing SoSoValue data, that U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs posted $225.2 million in net outflows after a seven-session inflow streak that had pulled in close to $1 billion. BlackRock's IBIT accounted for most of the exit, with $202.5 million leaving the fund, while Morgan Stanley's MSBT was the only Bitcoin fund in the group to add money.

That matters, but do not overstate it. The same ETF complex had just shown signs of life. KuCoin carried a CryptoSlate report showing $424.7 million in outflows on July 13, which wiped out a prior $197.4 million weekly inflow and pushed the July 6 to July 13 balance negative. Then flows improved again. Barron's reported that Bitcoin ETFs had posted seven straight days of inflows by July 24, helping Bitcoin move close to $67,000 before the latest reversal.

You can see the hesitation. Money is willing to come back when the macro picture softens, then leaves quickly when yields and oil start flashing red. It is not clean capitulation. It is not durable accumulation either. For you, that distinction matters more than the daily price candle, because ETF demand has become one of the few visible ways to measure whether regulated capital is still adding exposure or simply trading around stress.

The setup is fragile. Bitcoin bounced from deeper levels earlier in July, but this time the market does not have the same obvious relief catalyst in front of it. If bulls want to change the tone, they need to reclaim the area near $67,000 that sellers rejected this week and hold it without leaning on a fresh ETF headline. Bulls need evidence. Until then, every bounce near $64,000 has to be treated as a test, not a turn.

Washington is part of the trade

The CLARITY Act is adding another layer of uncertainty at exactly the wrong moment. Congress.gov shows the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act passed the House on July 17, 2025, by 294-134, and Senator Cynthia Lummis said the Senate Banking Committee advanced the bill on May 14, 2026, by a 15-9 vote. It still needs the Senate floor. That is the hard part.

Prediction markets are not law, but they are useful when Washington is moving slowly. Polymarket's live market on whether the CLARITY Act will be signed into law in 2026 showed a 38% chance on July 26, down from the 43% level CoinDesk reported after President Trump agreed to an ethics provision earlier in the week. That is still possible. It is not confidence.

The ethics fight is not abstract. ABC News reported that Trump's 2025 financial disclosure showed more than $1.4 billion in crypto-related earnings, including $636 million from CIC Digital and $526 million from World Liberty Financial token sales. Senate Republicans released updated CLARITY Act text on July 22, and Quartz reported that the draft would bar the president and other federal officials from issuing or sponsoring digital assets, with the Justice Department enforcing the provision. CoinDesk reported that several Senate Democrats said the draft still falls short on ethics, consumer protection, illicit finance, conflicts of interest and market integrity.

Frankly, that is the real issue for institutions. A crypto market-structure bill may ultimately help Coinbase, ETF issuers and token projects by drawing clearer lines between the SEC and CFTC. But a bill tied up in presidential conflict questions, Democratic holdouts and a 60-vote Senate threshold is not a clean bullish catalyst. It is another item compliance desks have to price.

Bitcoin can survive political noise. It has done that for years. The problem this week is that the noise is arriving alongside ETF outflows, higher Treasury yields and crude oil pressure. If $64,000 breaks decisively, the next serious test is the late-June and early-July zone closer to $58,000 to $59,000. If buyers defend it, you still need to watch whether the defense comes from spot demand or short-term leverage. Those are different markets.

Right now, macro is not helping.

Also read: Chinese investors are using crypto derivatives to route around Beijing's AI stock controlsRobinhood's talks with Crypto.com signal that prediction markets are eating retail financeMoonPay acquires Glide to fix crypto's most maddening deposit problem

TOPICS
Judith Murphy is a financial journalist and market analyst covering AI, technology stocks, and emerging market trends. She has contributed to multiple financial publications and brings a data-driven approach to her coverage of the technology sector and its impact on global markets.
Related Articles
More posts →
Loading next article…
You're all caught up