The Bank Policy Institute is making a final push to attach a yield prohibition to the CLARITY Act before its Senate floor vote, a move that could gut the business models of Circle, Tether, and the broader DeFi lending sector.
With the Senate vote on the CLARITY Act approaching, the banking industry has dropped any pretense of neutrality. The Bank Policy Institute is leading an aggressive, eleventh-hour lobbying campaign to insert an amendment that would ban stablecoin issuers from paying yields to holders. The ask is blunt: reclassify any interest-bearing stablecoin as a security, forcing issuers through full banking registration requirements that would effectively make the current model illegal to operate.
The CLARITY Act was built as a safe harbor for stablecoins, intended to finally give the sector a regulatory framework it could grow within. What banks are now attempting is the opposite. By targeting yields specifically, the amendment would hollow out the bill's purpose and hand traditional financial institutions a structural advantage at precisely the moment crypto-native dollar instruments have started drawing real deposit competition.
The urgency is not hard to explain. Since the Fed's 2025 rate hike cycle, money has been price-sensitive and mobile. Stablecoins offering 4 to 5 percent yields have pulled liquidity that would otherwise sit in bank savings accounts or money market funds. For institutions already managing margin pressure on deposits, every dollar parked in USDC earning yield is a dollar not earning them a spread. A successful yield ban would redirect that capital back into traditional vehicles, saving the sector billions in deposit costs annually.
Senate Banking Committee leadership is reportedly under significant pressure to attach the prohibition before the bill reaches the floor. The Blockchain Association is fighting the amendment, but the lobbying weight of the banking sector is considerable, and the political window to resist it is narrow.
What Gets Wiped Out If It Passes
Circle and Tether are the most immediately exposed. Both rely on yield mechanisms, whether passed directly to holders or embedded into liquidity arrangements, as core parts of how they sustain adoption and manage reserves. Reclassifying their instruments as securities would trigger registration requirements that the current infrastructure is not built to meet on any reasonable timeline.
The knock-on effect runs deeper than the issuers themselves. DeFi lending protocols that have migrated to dollar-backed digital assets as their base layer would face a regulatory rug pull on their core collateral. Estimates circulating today put the potential market value at risk above $150 billion, concentrated in staking and lending sectors that have built their yield structures around stablecoin stability.
Markets are already reacting. Bitcoin and Ethereum saw selling pressure this morning as traders priced in the regulatory risk, a signal that the uncertainty alone is doing damage before any vote has taken place.
Regulatory Capture, Not Regulatory Clarity
It is worth being precise about what this lobbying effort actually represents. The CLARITY Act was framed as a path to regulatory certainty for digital assets. The yield ban amendment is not a clarification. It is an attempt by incumbents to use the legislative process to eliminate a competitive threat rather than govern it. That distinction matters for how investors and operators should read whatever eventually passes.
If the amendment fails, the CLARITY Act could still provide a genuine framework that gives stablecoin issuers legal ground to operate and grow. If it succeeds, the bill becomes a vehicle for competitive suppression dressed up as consumer protection.
The vote will be a meaningful indicator of how much regulatory capture the crypto sector is still vulnerable to, and how seriously Congress is willing to take the banking lobby's preferred outcome over the interests of a sector that has spent years asking for exactly this kind of legislative engagement. Watch the Senate Banking Committee in the next 48 to 72 hours. That is where this gets decided.
Also read: Bulgaria's Eighth Election Since 2021 Could Reshape EU Power Dynamics • UK Political Turmoil Creates Market Uncertainty for Crypto and Digital Assets • Iran Uranium Rejection Triggers Oil Spike and Crypto Volatility
