The European Commission has cleared the Saudi-led buyout of Electronic Arts under EU merger rules. Washington is now the serious test: a foreign sovereign fund taking control of a major American software and entertainment company.
Brussels said yes. Washington is harder. The European Commission cleared the $55 billion acquisition of Electronic Arts on July 23, saying the deal would not raise competition concerns under EU merger rules, according to Reuters. That was the expected answer. Antitrust was never the main problem here.
The sharper question sits in the United States, where EA's own filings say the transaction still needs approval from the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States. The merger agreement sets September 28, 2026 as the outside date for the deal, with a possible automatic extension to December 28 if required regulatory approvals, including CFIUS approval, have not been received and the other closing conditions are otherwise ready. So don't read September 28 as a CFIUS deadline. It is the date after which the parties may have more choices.
Brussels cleared the easy part
EA announced the deal on September 29, 2025, after signing the merger agreement the day before. Shareholders are due to receive $210 per share in cash, valuing the company at about $55 billion in enterprise terms. EA and PIF described it as the largest all-cash sponsor take-private investment in history. Reuters and S&P Global have both framed it as the largest leveraged buyout on record, ahead of the $45 billion TXU deal from 2007.
It is not small. The transaction is funded with about $36 billion in equity, including PIF's rollover of its existing 9.9 percent EA stake, and $20 billion of debt financing originally fully and solely committed by JPMorgan Chase Bank. EA's September 2025 announcement said $18 billion of that debt was expected to be funded at close. CreditSights called the financing record-setting and estimated about 6x gross leverage at closing.
The European Commission's merger review focused on competition. That made clearance likely because PIF acquiring EA does not combine two dominant video game publishers in the way Microsoft's Activision Blizzard deal did. The Commission said the transaction would have limited impact in the markets where the companies are active, including video games and esports. Fair enough. That is not the hard part.
A second European review remains live under the EU's Foreign Subsidies Regulation. Reuters reported that the Commission's decision under those subsidy rules is due by July 30 and that PIF is expected to win clearance there too. If that happens, Europe will have done what Europe was going to do: test the deal through process, then move aside.
CFIUS has the real file
CFIUS is different. It does not exist to decide whether gamers have enough rival football titles or whether EA Sports FC has too much market share. It exists to ask whether foreign control of a US business creates national security risk. EA is headquartered in Redwood City, California. It runs online games, account systems, payments, player communications and live-service platforms at huge scale. You don't have to exaggerate the point. That is exactly the kind of data footprint CFIUS was built to examine.
Senators Richard Blumenthal and Elizabeth Warren made that case directly in an October 14, 2025 letter to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and EA CEO Andrew Wilson. They urged a rigorous review, cited PIF's role as a strategic arm of the Saudi government, and asked how sensitive personal information from EA users would be protected. They also raised concerns about EA's artificial intelligence work and the potential for foreign influence over product direction.
That concern has a firmer public record than some of the looser commentary around the deal. EA's Frostbite engine is real. EA's own technology pages describe it as the engine behind Battlefield and other titles, with physics, rendering, destruction, animation and world-building tools. But public evidence that CFIUS is specifically treating Frostbite as a defense-adjacent asset is thin. The cleaner fact is this: lawmakers and legal commentators have focused on user data, AI capability, source code and influence. That is enough.
The ownership structure makes the politics harder to wave away. A November filing with Brazil's antitrust regulator, first reported by The Wall Street Journal and picked up by the Los Angeles Times and Sports Business Journal, showed PIF would own 93.4 percent of EA after the buyout. Silver Lake would hold 5.5 percent. Affinity Partners would hold 1.1 percent. The word consortium does a lot of softening there. Control would sit overwhelmingly with Saudi Arabia's sovereign wealth fund.
Jared Kushner's Affinity Partners adds a second layer. Forbes says Kushner founded the Miami-based firm in 2021 and that it managed more than $5.4 billion as of September 2025. The firm has also drawn long-running scrutiny because Saudi PIF committed $2 billion to it after Kushner left the White House. The Lawfare Institute put the political question bluntly in October 2025, asking whether a Trump-era CFIUS process would seriously scrutinize a deal involving a Trump family member. Frankly, that is a fair question.
PIF's gaming push is not new. It already controls Savvy Games Group and has invested across gaming and esports. The Conversation published an analysis by Jacqueline Burgess of the University of the Sunshine Coast describing the EA deal as part of possible "game-washing," a version of the sportswashing critique attached to Saudi Arabia's LIV Golf push and its stake in Newcastle United. CFIUS will not decide the case on culture-washing grounds. But politics rarely stays politely outside the room.
If CFIUS clears the deal with mitigation, expect conditions around data governance, access controls, security oversight and limits on foreign access to sensitive systems. Treasury's own CFIUS guidance says mitigation can include security officers, board observers, audits and restrictions on a foreign investor's role. If CFIUS demands terms the parties can live with, EA goes private and PIF gets one of the most important entertainment assets in America.
If the terms are too hard, the deal gets messy. EA's share price has carried an acquisition premium for months, and the company has already been operating under the shadow of a pending take-private. Brussels has now removed one obstacle. It has not answered the central question. Washington still has to decide what Saudi control of EA would actually mean.
Also read: Runway bets on being the infrastructure layer under every generative media model • Microsoft is replacing OpenAI's image models in PowerPoint and Bing with its own MAI-Image-2 • Oil at $100 is rewriting the cost of money and every startup valuation along with it
