ASML has become the Netherlands' pressure point in the US-China chip fight, and Washington's latest push shows why The Hague can't treat export controls as someone else's problem.
There's a number behind the Dutch anxiety: about a third of ASML's 2025 sales came from China. You don't need a briefing book to understand why that concentrates minds in The Hague. ASML is not a side character in Europe's technology story. It is the Veldhoven company that makes the machines advanced chipmakers need, and it is now being pulled between US security policy, Chinese demand and Dutch sovereignty.
According to Barron's, ASML had expected China to make up about 20% of 2026 sales after Chinese customers accounted for roughly a third of sales in 2025. That gap is the story. The company has spent years telling investors that restrictions on China can be managed, but the Chinese market has kept proving larger, more stubborn and more useful to ASML's order book than Washington would like.
Also read: Uber burned through its 2026 AI budget in four months and now every CTO is paying attention • Zoox unveils a redesigned robotaxi but a federal waiver stands between Amazon and its first fare • Vishal Sikka's new AI startup wants to do what Infosys once paid him to prevent
The latest pressure point is the MATCH Act, the bipartisan US bill introduced in April to tighten controls on semiconductor manufacturing equipment sold to China. Reuters reported, through a later account of the revised bill, that lawmakers softened parts of the proposal after industry pushback, including language around some chipmaking tools. But the direction of travel is still clear enough: Congress wants fewer advanced tools, fewer services and fewer routes for Chinese chipmakers to lean on non-US suppliers.
ASML sits right in the middle of that argument. Its most advanced extreme ultraviolet lithography machines, known as EUV systems, have been blocked from China since 2019. The tougher fight is over older deep ultraviolet machines, especially immersion DUV systems that are less advanced than EUV but still valuable for Chinese manufacturers trying to keep moving. If you are Beijing, those tools help keep domestic chip production alive. If you are Washington, they are a leak in the wall.
Washington wants control beyond its borders
Here's the thing: this is not only about ASML selling machines. It is about whether the US can keep extending its technology controls through allies whose companies are not American. The Netherlands has already aligned with Washington on EUV and some advanced DUV restrictions, but each new round raises the same question in sharper form. How much of Dutch industrial policy should be written in Washington?
That is why the politics are awkward. The US has a real national security argument, especially when China's chipmakers are trying to reduce their dependence on Western suppliers. But the Netherlands has a real industrial argument too. ASML is one of the few European companies that can honestly claim global technology leadership in a field everyone cares about. You don't casually turn that company into collateral damage just because Congress wants a cleaner China policy.
The tension became sharper this month after Bloomberg reported that US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick raised concerns with ASML executives that China may have obtained EUV-related technology despite restrictions. ASML flatly rejected that claim. In a statement reported by Tom's Hardware and others, the company said it has never shipped an EUV machine to China and has not shipped components, modules or equipment specially designed for use in an EUV machine to China.
That denial matters because EUV is not a laptop someone can slip through customs. ASML said an EUV scanner has about 100,000 components and weighs around 180 tons. The company also said it tracks its EUV systems and that none are in China. If Washington has evidence to the contrary, it has not put it in public. Until it does, the responsible position is simple: report the concern as Bloomberg's report, and report ASML's denial just as plainly.
Beijing still has leverage
China's leverage is not subtle. It is demand. ASML's machines are expensive, specialized and essential, and Chinese chipmakers have had strong reason to buy what they can while rules allow it. That buying pulled forward sales in recent years and left ASML with a larger China exposure than many investors expected. It also gave Beijing a commercial tie to one of Europe's most valuable technology companies.
Frankly, that is the part Washington often underplays. Export controls sound tidy when they are written as categories on a page: EUV blocked, DUV narrowed, servicing restricted, entity lists updated. In the real economy, those categories hit a Dutch company, its customers, its suppliers and a government trying to keep a strategic champion from being squeezed by two bigger powers.
For readers watching the chip fight from the startup and investor side, ASML is the reminder that hardware power is not only about the chips themselves. Nvidia can design the accelerator, TSMC can manufacture it, and cloud companies can spend billions renting it out. But without lithography, the whole stack gets fragile fast. That is why a Dutch equipment maker can become a diplomatic problem in Washington and Beijing at the same time.
The Netherlands cannot escape this fight by pretending it is only a US-China issue. ASML's 2025 China sales made that impossible. The harder question now is whether The Hague can defend its own company while still keeping faith with allied security policy. That balance will get tested every time Washington writes another rule and Beijing keeps trying to buy another machine.
