President Trump announced that the US government has made over $30 billion on its Intel equity stake in the past 90 days alone, after buying 433 million shares at $20.47 in August 2025 and watching the stock surge past $94 by late April 2026, a return that would make any fund manager jealous.
In August 2025, the Trump administration did something no US government had done before at this scale. It converted $8.9 billion in unallocated CHIPS Act grants and Secure Enclave program funding into a direct equity stake in Intel, purchasing 433.3 million shares at $20.47 each, giving the federal government a 9.9% ownership position in one of America's most important semiconductor companies. At the time, the deal raised eyebrows. Intel was struggling. Its stock had been in a prolonged decline. The idea that turning a federal grant into an equity holding would produce better returns for taxpayers than just disbursing the funding as originally intended was, at minimum, a speculative bet. Nine months later, that bet has produced one of the most extraordinary paper returns in US government investment history.
Intel shares closed at $94.75 on April 29, having risen 12% in a single session after the company reported first-quarter results that beat analyst expectations, with FY2026 revenue guidance of $13.58 billion. Year-to-date, the stock is up 118%. Since the government's purchase in August, it has surged more than 300%, pushing the federal stake from an $8.9 billion investment to a position worth over $41 billion. The unrealised gain sits at more than $32 billion. Trump posted on Truth Social: "I'm very proud of that Company in that I am responsible for making the United States of America over 30 Billion Dollars in the last 90 days on that stock alone." He added that there are others he has been similarly successful with by "taking pieces of the Equity for support."
That last line is the one worth pausing on. The Intel deal was structured as a conversion of existing grant commitments rather than a new appropriation, but the template Trump appears to be sketching in his post is broader: a model in which government financial support to strategic industries comes not in the form of grants or loans but equity stakes that give taxpayers upside exposure to corporate performance. He has already taken equity in rare earth companies as part of resource and supply chain agreements. The Intel result gives that approach a dramatic headline number to point to, and it will almost certainly accelerate the administration's appetite for similar arrangements in semiconductors, energy, and defence-adjacent manufacturing.
The mechanics of the Intel turnaround are worth understanding separately from the government's investment narrative. CEO Lip-Bu Tan, who took over from Pat Gelsinger in late 2024, has restructured the company's foundry strategy, cut costs aggressively, and refocused Intel's competitive positioning around its advanced packaging capabilities and domestic manufacturing advantage. The Q1 2026 earnings beat was driven by a combination of data centre chip demand, AI inference workloads, and the re-onshoring of semiconductor procurement that US national security policy has been pushing for several years. None of that is purely attributable to the government's equity stake. The company was already executing a turnaround. The government bought in at what turned out to be close to the bottom.
There is also a governance dimension that has attracted less attention than it deserves. Under the terms of the August deal, the government agreed to vote with Intel's board on matters requiring shareholder approval, with limited exceptions. It has no board representation and no governance or information rights beyond what any large passive shareholder would receive. That structure was deliberate: the administration wanted the economic upside without the political complications of having federal officials involved in corporate decision-making. Whether that passive posture remains politically sustainable if the government's stake appreciates to $50 billion or $60 billion is a question that has not been seriously tested yet.
The broader context is the global semiconductor race, which the US has concluded it cannot afford to lose. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company controls the majority of advanced chip production globally, and the dependency on a single geographic chokepoint for technology that underpins everything from consumer electronics to military systems has been treated as a strategic liability for several years. The CHIPS Act was designed to correct that by incentivising domestic manufacturing. The Intel equity deal converted part of that incentive structure from a transfer payment into an ownership stake, aligning government and corporate interests more directly than a grant ever could. If Intel continues to execute and the stock holds its gains, the administration will have demonstrated that industrial policy can generate financial returns as well as strategic ones.
The number that will follow Trump around for the rest of his term is the $32 billion unrealised gain on an $8.9 billion investment. Whether he can repeat it with the other equity-for-support arrangements he referenced, and whether those gains ever crystallise into actual government receipts rather than paper profits, are questions the market will watch closely. For now, the Intel trade is a genuinely good result for American taxpayers, and acknowledging that does not require endorsing the broader direction of state-driven capitalism that it represents.
","excerpt":"The US government's $8.9 billion Intel stake, purchased at $20.47 in August 2025, is now worth over $41 billion after Intel stock surged past $94.
Also read: Musely raises $360 million without giving up equity and shows how consumer startups are rewriting the funding playbook • Nobitex reached 11 million users and Reuters showed that consumer scale in a sanctioned market is a liability not just an achievement • The Nobitex story is a warning about what happens when a fintech startup grows faster than its accountability
