John Ternus is inheriting more than Tim Cook's title. He is inheriting an Apple where design lost power, and his first real test is whether he gives it back.
Apple's next era starts on September 1, when John Ternus is set to replace Tim Cook as chief executive and Cook moves to executive chairman. Apple announced the succession in April, and Barron's was still writing about Cook's record this week because the numbers are impossible to ignore: Cook turned Apple into a company worth more than $4 trillion at points and made operations the spine of the business.
That spine also became the problem. You can run a company brilliantly and still dull the thing that made people care about its products in the first place. Apple under Cook shipped the Apple Watch, AirPods, Apple Silicon Macs and the Vision Pro. It also became a place where design no longer had the clean authority it had when Jony Ive sat close to Steve Jobs and could bend the company around a product decision.
Look at the reporting around the design group and the story is not subtle. After Ive left in 2019, Apple said industrial design leader Evans Hankey and human interface design leader Alan Dye would report to Jeff Williams, the operations executive who had become Cook's most important lieutenant. Hankey later left. Williams retired in 2025. The Verge reported last year that Apple's design team would then report directly to Cook. By December, Dye was gone too, with Bloomberg reporting he was leaving Apple to become Meta's chief design officer.
That one matters. Dye had led Apple's user interface design since 2015 and worked on interfaces for the Apple Watch, iPhone X and Vision Pro. Meta did not hire him to decorate a corner of Reality Labs. Mark Zuckerberg said Dye would run a new creative studio covering hardware, software and AI interfaces. When your rival is hiring the person who shaped the way your products feel in the hand and on the screen, you don't call that normal turnover. You call it a warning.
Ternus has to repair the chain of command
Ternus is not Jony Ive, and Apple should not pretend he is. He joined Apple in 2001, rose through hardware engineering and became senior vice president of hardware engineering in 2021. His public reputation is built around getting products made, not around explaining why a radius, hinge or animation matters more than the spreadsheet says it does.
That may be exactly why this moment is interesting. A design revival at Apple will not come from nostalgia. It will come from a CEO who understands that hardware, software and operations have to meet earlier, before the product has hardened into a set of compromises nobody wants to own. Bloomberg reported in January that Ternus had taken oversight of Apple's design organization, a move widely read as another sign of his rise toward the top job. If that reporting holds, he has already been given the part of Apple most in need of authority.
You can see the same issue in Vision Pro. Apple built a technically astonishing headset and priced it at $3,499. The device proved Apple could still make something other companies struggle to match. It also proved that technical brilliance is not the same as product inevitability. A computer for your face has to answer a cruelly simple question: who is going to wear this every day, and why?
Apple's next devices will make that question harder, not easier. The New York Post reported this week that Apple is preparing AI-focused wearables, including camera-equipped AirPods and smart glasses expected around late 2027. Meta already has Ray-Ban smart glasses in the market. OpenAI bought Ive's hardware startup. The fight is no longer only over chips and displays. It is over whether AI devices can feel normal enough for real people to use without feeling ridiculous.
That is a design problem before it is a marketing problem.
The lesson is not only Apple's
Founders should pay attention here because the Apple story is just the scaled-up version of a familiar company disease. You start with a small group of people who care intensely about the product. Then you add process, finance reviews, launch calendars and cross-functional meetings. Nobody means to weaken the product instinct. It happens because every extra layer gets a veto and fewer people have a mandate.
Cook's Apple did not fail. Frankly, that is why the lesson is useful. Failure is easy to diagnose. Success that slowly changes the internal power structure is harder, because the revenue keeps proving the old decisions right. Apple sold hundreds of millions of iPhones, built a services machine and made its supply chain one of the great business systems in the world. The cost showed up somewhere else: in the feeling that Apple products were becoming more efficient than surprising.
Ternus does not need to tear down Cook's machine. He needs to decide who gets to say no inside it. If design only receives decisions after operations, finance and engineering have shaped the product, Apple will keep making capable things that feel safer than they should. If design is back in the first room, with real authority and not just taste-level consultation, the company has a chance to make the post-Cook era feel different for customers, not only different on an org chart.
The clock is practical. Ternus takes over on September 1. Smart glasses, AI wearables and whatever follows Vision Pro will not be judged by how cleanly Apple explains them in a keynote. They will be judged by whether you want to use them after the novelty wears off. That is where design either has power, or it doesn't.
Also read: OpenAI's Pentagon deal the morning after Anthropic's ban signals how Washington now picks AI winners • Enterprise AI budgets hit a wall and the reckoning is reshaping how companies spend and how founders pitch • Old EV batteries are quietly becoming the cheapest way to power AI data centers
