A 140-company consortium including Visa, Mastercard, Stripe, BlackRock, and Coinbase launched Open USD on June 30, sending Circle's stock down and signaling that the stablecoin market's current profit structure may not survive the year.
The stablecoin business has always had a quiet secret: the companies issuing dollar-pegged tokens pocket all the interest earned on the reserves backing them. You park your dollars, they buy Treasuries, and the yield disappears into their revenue. Circle built $2.64 billion of its $2.75 billion in 2025 revenue that way. Tether, which doesn't publish audited financials, almost certainly does better. Open Standard, the entity behind the newly announced Open USD, is betting that secret is about to become a liability.
On Tuesday, Open Standard unveiled OUSD, a stablecoin backed by an extraordinary coalition: Visa, Mastercard, Stripe, BlackRock, BNY Mellon, Coinbase, Google, Shopify, Ripple, Aave, MetaMask, Fireblocks, and more than 140 other companies. The token will launch natively on Solana later in 2026. Its governing principle is a direct attack on the incumbent business model: partners get nearly all of the reserve yield back, after a small management fee, with free minting and redemption and no volume caps. The businesses building on top of OUSD, rather than the issuer, capture the economics.
Circle's stock fell on the news. That reaction is rational. Circle's reserve income of $653 million in Q1 2026 alone grew 17% year-over-year as USDC in circulation swelled 39% to $77 billion. That compounding math only works if Circle stays the preferred dollar token for the partners building financial products on top of it. If those same partners, Visa and Coinbase among them, shift to a stablecoin that hands most of the yield back, Circle's entire revenue model becomes harder to defend. The brutal part is that Coinbase, Circle's distribution partner and a firm that shares in USDC's economics, is listed as an OUSD backer.
What makes this moment different from previous stablecoin challengers is the breadth of the coalition's payment infrastructure. Visa and Mastercard together touch the overwhelming majority of card-based commerce globally. Stripe processes hundreds of billions in payments annually. Shopify sits on top of millions of merchants. These are not crypto-native entities experimenting at the edge; they are the pipes through which modern commerce actually moves. Unifying them behind a single stablecoin outside the Tether-Circle duopoly creates a distribution network that neither incumbent can match from their current position.
The stablecoin market currently sits at roughly $321 billion, according to data from Bitcoin Foundation and DefiLlama, with Tether commanding around 59 to 65 percent of that figure and Circle holding close to 25 percent. Both incumbents are absent from the OUSD consortium. Tether, which serves a largely offshore, crypto-native user base, is probably the less immediately threatened: its dominance runs deep in markets where Visa and Mastercard settlement isn't the relevant infrastructure. Circle is in a different position. USDC was explicitly built for the regulated financial ecosystem now coalescing around OUSD.
As Forbes noted in its analysis of the announcement, an open standard governed by its users has structural advantages that a single-issuer model cannot easily replicate. Governance of OUSD sits with the consortium's partner board rather than with one company, which means no single firm can extract economics from participants the way an issuer can. That's a meaningful pitch to any regulated institution that has watched Tether operate for years without a full public audit and watched Circle quietly keep billions in Treasury income that its ecosystem partners generated but never received.
The Solana choice also matters. Solana's throughput and transaction costs have made it the dominant chain for payment-oriented stablecoin applications over the past two years, and launching natively there rather than as a multi-chain afterthought signals that Open Standard is building for actual volume, not for press releases.
Whether OUSD actually displaces USDC at scale depends on execution, regulatory clarity under the Clarity Act now moving through Congress, and whether the consortium partners follow through with real integration rather than logo placement. These multi-company stablecoin initiatives have a history of announcing loudly and deploying quietly. But the structural argument here is harder to dismiss than most. When the businesses creating demand for a stablecoin are also the businesses capturing its reserve yield, they have a direct financial incentive to use it that no amount of USDC marketing can easily overcome. Circle will need an answer before OUSD's launch date arrives.
Also read: OKX bets the agentic economy needs its own payment rails before anyone else builds them • Ionic Digital takes Celsius Network's ruins to Nasdaq at a $2 billion valuation • JPMorgan is treating digital assets as core banking infrastructure and the rest of Wall Street is following
