Jun 24, 2026 · 7:39 AM
Subscribe
Home Ai

China has put reusable rockets back in focus with Long March 12B

China’s Long March 12B made its maiden flight on June 1, carrying Qianfan broadband satellites and giving Beijing a larger reusable launch platform for megaconstellation deployment. The rocket is not a proven Falcon 9 rival yet, but its state-backed commercial model could reshape the launch market.

Judith Murphy
· 5 min read · 516 views
China has put reusable rockets back in focus with Long March 12B

China’s new Long March 12B is not a Falcon 9 killer yet. But it shows how quickly Beijing is building the launch system it needs for a satellite internet race that is getting harder to ignore.

China quietly launched a new reusable rocket design on June 1, and the silence around the flight may be almost as important as the rocket itself. The Long March 12B lifted off from the Dongfeng commercial space innovation zone at Jiuquan at 4:40 p.m. Beijing time, carrying another group of Qianfan broadband satellites into their planned orbit.

State media called the maiden flight a complete success. That part matters. A new vehicle with a 72-meter frame, a 4.37-meter body diameter and a two-stage kerosene and liquid oxygen design is not a small experiment. CASC says the rocket can carry about 20 metric tons to low Earth orbit, which puts it in the same broad conversation as the medium-heavy reusable rockets that have changed the economics of satellite deployment.

But the bigger point is this: China is no longer treating reusable launch as an interesting side project. It is making it part of the machinery required to build megaconstellations, compete with Starlink-style networks and give state-backed commercial space companies the kind of launch cadence that private startups usually struggle to reach.

The Long March 12B is designed around first-stage recovery, but this launch did not attempt to recover the booster. According to Xinhua, CASC said a recovery test is planned for a later mission. That is the line between a successful debut and a true reusable rocket business.

Getting payloads to orbit is difficult. Bringing the first stage back reliably, inspecting it quickly and flying it again at commercial tempo is the harder test. SpaceX did not turn Falcon 9 into the most important launch vehicle in the world simply by landing boosters. It did so by making reuse routine enough that customers, insurers and satellite operators could plan around it.

That is why calling Long March 12B a direct Falcon 9 challenger is both fair and premature. It is fair because the design ambition is obvious: large payloads, constellation missions, grid-fin and landing hardware development, and a future recovery path. It is premature because costs, turnaround time and repeat flight data are still missing. A rocket becomes disruptive only when the second and third flights are boring.

The opacity around the launch also complicates the story. SpaceNews and other space industry observers noted that the flight appeared to happen without the usual public airspace or maritime warnings that analysts expect before orbital launches. China has launched on short notice before, but a large reusable vehicle flying from an inland site is exactly the kind of event where transparency matters. Falling stages and changing flight paths are not just domestic engineering issues. They are part of how launch markets build trust.

Qianfan is the customer that changes the math

The payload was another batch for Qianfan, also known as Spacesail or Thousand Sails, China’s Shanghai-linked broadband constellation. That is not an incidental customer. It is the demand engine behind the rocket.

Qianfan is meant to become a large low Earth orbit internet network, with public filings and industry reporting pointing to an initial phase of 1,296 satellites and a long-term plan of roughly 15,000 satellites by 2030. Even if China misses early deployment targets, the direction is clear. A country cannot build that kind of network with occasional launches and disposable rockets forever.

This is where the space internet race becomes a launch infrastructure race. Starlink’s advantage is not only the satellites. It is the fact that SpaceX owns the rocket, the satellite production line, the ground system and the customer relationship. That vertical integration lets it move faster than rivals that must wait for launch slots, negotiate capacity and absorb outside pricing.

China is trying to answer that with a different structure. CASC remains the dominant state contractor, but its Shanghai-based commercial launch unit is being used to serve commercial-looking missions backed by public industrial policy. Qianfan is tied to Shanghai’s space economy. Long March 12B is built by a CASC commercial subsidiary. The model is not Silicon Valley private space, but it is not old-style national space planning either.

For private Chinese launch startups, that creates opportunity and pressure at the same time. Companies such as LandSpace, iSpace and Galactic Energy can benefit from a national push that expands capital, suppliers and launch demand. They also have to compete with state-backed companies that can move with government support, established test sites and guaranteed strategic customers.

For investors and satellite operators outside China, the lesson is simple. The next phase of space competition will not be decided by one spectacular launch. It will be decided by who can industrialize launches cheaply enough to keep filling low Earth orbit with working satellites. Long March 12B has taken the first step, but the market will watch the landing tests, the second mission and the speed at which China can turn a successful debut into a repeatable system.

Also read: Google is making Android verify who is really calling.Amazon faces a privacy test over Ring’s facial recognition featureMicrosoft gives AI agents a safer way to work on Windows

TOPICS
Judith Murphy is a financial journalist and market analyst covering AI, technology stocks, and emerging market trends. She has contributed to multiple financial publications and brings a data-driven approach to her coverage of the technology sector and its impact on global markets.
Related Articles
More posts →
Loading next article…
You're all caught up